Monica Foster At Home - Christian Pornstar edition - a prayer for Tanner Mayes and the truth about Los Angeles porn
Tuesday, July 24, 2012
Monica Foster At Home - Christian Pornstar edition - a prayer for Tanner Mayes and the truth about Los Angeles porn
Sunday, July 8, 2012
Monica Foster interviews self defined Christian & Pornstar Nick Manning
Monica Foster interviews pornstar legend Nick Manning, a self defined Christian!
I guess it's a good thing Monica Foster created www.ChristianPornstar.com after all...Watch more celebrity interviews on www.MindOfMonica.com
Wednesday, May 30, 2012
Monica Foster at Home : LA porn industry selling synthetic drug type substances as herbal incense and bath salts to teens
On this Monica Foster at Home ( Christian Pornstar edition broadcast ) Monica Foster discusses how Los Angeles porn industry professionals are moving into the SYNTHETIC drug industry by legally selling the substances which emulate marijuana, cocaine, ecstacy, cystal meth, etc as "herbal incense" and "bath salts".
Monica Foster shares a recent news story out of Miami which recently made national news about a man who reportedly may have been high on bath salts who attacked a victim and then proceeded to eat their face (cannibalism).
Monica explains to her viewers how porn directors such as Will Ryder akak Jeff Mullen are actively marketing "legal highs" as herbal incenses and bath salts to people as younger (or younger) than 18 years old online through pornography cross promotion.
Monica warns that these are highly addictive substances (just as pornography is highly addictive psychologically) and concludes by questioning how wide spread the use of theses substances are in the Los Angeles porn industry.
Did pornstars Steve Driver and Sledge Hammer use herbal incense and bath salts to achieve a legal high that wouldn't be detectable on a drug test, but that may have caused their strange, violent and erratic behavior before their deaths?
Charlie Sheen and Bree Olson appear to be actively assisting Will Ryder of All Media Play / Sitcums with his promotion of these potentially dangerous substances. Are their "testimonials" real?
Sunday, May 20, 2012
Pornstar Hooker Watch - Lets put the illegal Los Angeles escort and prostitution rings out of business and their operators IN JAIL
http://PornStarHookerWatch.blogspot.com
It's time to put the illegal Los Angeles escort and prostitution rings out of business and their operators IN JAIL.
Wednesday, April 25, 2012
The GettingIntoPorn blog is merging with www.PornNewsToday.com !
PornNewsToday (PNT) has a new home and look!
This week, I'm in the process of transferring GettingIntoPorn.blogspot.com from here on Blogger to it's new home:
I should have everything functional and integrated with www.MonicaAtHome.com , www.ChristianPornStar.com and several other websites by the end of the week!
Make sure you update your bookmarks to www.PornNewsToday to keep up with the latest and greatest adult industry news posts and commentaries by yours truly - Monica Foster :)
Thursday, April 19, 2012
Industry Advocates Question L.A. Condom Ordinance at City Hall
Monica Foster commentary: Question and complain about this all you want LA porn industry (specifically the Free Speech Coalition). I've never in my life seen (nor could I have ever imagined) such a disgusting, negative, self entitled, unjustifiably pretentious, self absorbed, prejudiced, violent, immature group of thieving bullies. I personally hope that those in the group I just described who have lived a cushy life for far to long victimizing, using and mistreating others, lose EVERYTHING that they have.
courtesy Xbiz.com
The Adult Film Industry Working Group, a panel put together by the Los Angeles City Council to implement the city’s mandatory condom ordinance, met for a second time on Wednesday to review a 10-page draft of recommendations to the mayor and City Council.
The meeting, held for one hour at the 15th Floor Conference Room at City Hall, began with City Administrative Officer Miguel A. Santana asking Film LA President Paul Audley and Vice President of Communications & Public Affairs Todd Lindgren to describe the process by which adult content producers are identified and whether there is concern over First Amendment rights violations once a producer discloses that they will be shooting adult content.
Film LA, a private, non-profit organization that coordinates and processes permits for on-location productions in Los Angeles, made it known that, aside from producers voluntarily disclosing the content of their movies, there is no system in place that would make the city privy to that content. As for First Amendment concerns, the group fielded the issue to the City Attorney’s office.
City Attorney counsel Kimberly Miera said that asking producers what they were going to shoot is not a First Amendment violation, but that any discrimination suffered after disclosure “might be seen as such,” adding that each case would be “fact specific” and that the City “doesn’t generally discriminate or retaliate against someone based on content. That said, pornography is not protected by First Amendment speech.”
Attorney and Free Speech Coalition chairman Jeffrey Douglas was quick to correct the City Attorney’s office once the floor was opened to those in attendance, stating that, “I believe the City Attorney representative misspoke when she said that pornography is not protected by the First Amendment; obscenity is not protected by the First Amendment.
“Pornography is fully and completely protected by the First Amendment. If you want a list of cases, there’s about 2000 of them from every court in the United States, starting with the United States Supreme Court and down.”
Douglas went on to criticize the city for attempting to regulate an industry while excluding it from the process, noting that allotting industry members just three minutes to speak for themselves during meetings was not enough.
“The notion that a formal working group was established to regulate an industry without formal participation from that industry is shortsighted,” Douglas said. “Being allowed to speak for three minutes does not equate, by any means, to the participation of the other groups. The most certain way to generate ineffectual regulation is not to engage in real dialogue with the industry you regulate, no matter how detested or socially unattractive an industry is. The fact that we were not invited from the get-go is regrettable.”
Ironically, Douglas was cut short at the three-minute mark, but assured that he could contact the CAO office to set up a meeting for future discussion.
Industry attorney and XBIZ contributor Michael Fattorosi used his three minutes to address the enforcement aspects of the ordinance.
“What if the producer happens to be an entity that is outside the jurisdiction of Los Angeles?” he questioned. “This is now a global business; this isn’t a Los Angeles business any more. There are producers that live in Europe, Canada, outside the state of California, and they are the actual people who finance these films."
[Then those PRODUCERS should shoot their films IN EUROPE or IN CANADA and get the FUCK OUT OF THE USA IF THEY DON'T WANT TO OBEY OUR LAWS! And what do you care Fattorosi? Aren't you the same fucker who threw the majority of the porn industry under the bus by assisting Donny Long with PORNWIKILEAKS?]
“Are those the producers who are going to be charged under this law or are we going to go after the worker who is a hired for-the-day performer or for-the-day director? Same thing for the owners of the filming location. Are we going to be confiscating equipment? Are we holding that equipment until the first hearing date? Are you going to be holding equipment of an employee? Are you going to be holding the equipment of the producer?”
“These are all issues that this law has with actual on-the-street enforcement that need to be addressed and resolved before you can even think about putting this measure in place,” Fattorosi continued. “I think what you’ll end up doing is netting a lot of innocent people that don’t have a lot of control over their working environment. I don’t know if LAPD or the city is going to look at extraditing producers from overseas into the California court where there’s no jurisdiction, but it’s a question that I have to raise.”
Santana closed the meeting by noting points that would be addressed at the next meeting: First Amendment issues, associated cost with identifying permit seekers interested in producing adult films and an attachment from Cal-OSHA, which was not present.
A third meeting is set for early May before the group must submit to counsel.
courtesy Xbiz.com
The Adult Film Industry Working Group, a panel put together by the Los Angeles City Council to implement the city’s mandatory condom ordinance, met for a second time on Wednesday to review a 10-page draft of recommendations to the mayor and City Council.
The meeting, held for one hour at the 15th Floor Conference Room at City Hall, began with City Administrative Officer Miguel A. Santana asking Film LA President Paul Audley and Vice President of Communications & Public Affairs Todd Lindgren to describe the process by which adult content producers are identified and whether there is concern over First Amendment rights violations once a producer discloses that they will be shooting adult content.
Film LA, a private, non-profit organization that coordinates and processes permits for on-location productions in Los Angeles, made it known that, aside from producers voluntarily disclosing the content of their movies, there is no system in place that would make the city privy to that content. As for First Amendment concerns, the group fielded the issue to the City Attorney’s office.
City Attorney counsel Kimberly Miera said that asking producers what they were going to shoot is not a First Amendment violation, but that any discrimination suffered after disclosure “might be seen as such,” adding that each case would be “fact specific” and that the City “doesn’t generally discriminate or retaliate against someone based on content. That said, pornography is not protected by First Amendment speech.”
Attorney and Free Speech Coalition chairman Jeffrey Douglas was quick to correct the City Attorney’s office once the floor was opened to those in attendance, stating that, “I believe the City Attorney representative misspoke when she said that pornography is not protected by the First Amendment; obscenity is not protected by the First Amendment.
“Pornography is fully and completely protected by the First Amendment. If you want a list of cases, there’s about 2000 of them from every court in the United States, starting with the United States Supreme Court and down.”
Douglas went on to criticize the city for attempting to regulate an industry while excluding it from the process, noting that allotting industry members just three minutes to speak for themselves during meetings was not enough.
“The notion that a formal working group was established to regulate an industry without formal participation from that industry is shortsighted,” Douglas said. “Being allowed to speak for three minutes does not equate, by any means, to the participation of the other groups. The most certain way to generate ineffectual regulation is not to engage in real dialogue with the industry you regulate, no matter how detested or socially unattractive an industry is. The fact that we were not invited from the get-go is regrettable.”
Ironically, Douglas was cut short at the three-minute mark, but assured that he could contact the CAO office to set up a meeting for future discussion.
Industry attorney and XBIZ contributor Michael Fattorosi used his three minutes to address the enforcement aspects of the ordinance.
“What if the producer happens to be an entity that is outside the jurisdiction of Los Angeles?” he questioned. “This is now a global business; this isn’t a Los Angeles business any more. There are producers that live in Europe, Canada, outside the state of California, and they are the actual people who finance these films."
[Then those PRODUCERS should shoot their films IN EUROPE or IN CANADA and get the FUCK OUT OF THE USA IF THEY DON'T WANT TO OBEY OUR LAWS! And what do you care Fattorosi? Aren't you the same fucker who threw the majority of the porn industry under the bus by assisting Donny Long with PORNWIKILEAKS?]
“Are those the producers who are going to be charged under this law or are we going to go after the worker who is a hired for-the-day performer or for-the-day director? Same thing for the owners of the filming location. Are we going to be confiscating equipment? Are we holding that equipment until the first hearing date? Are you going to be holding equipment of an employee? Are you going to be holding the equipment of the producer?”
“These are all issues that this law has with actual on-the-street enforcement that need to be addressed and resolved before you can even think about putting this measure in place,” Fattorosi continued. “I think what you’ll end up doing is netting a lot of innocent people that don’t have a lot of control over their working environment. I don’t know if LAPD or the city is going to look at extraditing producers from overseas into the California court where there’s no jurisdiction, but it’s a question that I have to raise.”
Santana closed the meeting by noting points that would be addressed at the next meeting: First Amendment issues, associated cost with identifying permit seekers interested in producing adult films and an attachment from Cal-OSHA, which was not present.
A third meeting is set for early May before the group must submit to counsel.
Adult Webmasters Popped for Sexual Assault in Canada
This summary is not available. Please
click here to view the post.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

